The 36 set sieve isolates all primes and pseudo primes, so far it seems that this differentiates and we can build up the sets of primes completly because all other numbers are sieved out. It is NOT a primary sieve for primality, which may come.
Understand that we did not have a chance to thoroughly check this through even yet, but it will be , but still it is useful , may be the divisor may need adjustment
On Mar 10, 5:38 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...@verizon.net> wrote:
> The 36 set sieve isolates all primes and pseudo primes, so far it > seems that this differentiates and we can build up the sets of primes > completly because all other numbers are sieved out. It is NOT a > primary sieve for primality, which may come.
> Understand that we did not have a chance to thoroughly check this > through even yet, but it will be , but still it is useful , may be the > divisor may need adjustment
> Hope research
Every number divisible by 1.75 is also divisible by 7; so why not use 7 as a primality divisor?
Dividing by 1.75 is exactly the same as multiplying by 4/7.
Essentially, a thorough primality test might consist of a trial division by every prime <= Sqrt(N).
But this method has been in use for at least a millenia.
|
